Hamus Yaigh

The left are still living in your head rent free. Get over it. Trump was elected 7 months ago, he owns this shtshow now.

Utter nonsense. The decline in booster uptake is more accurately explained by the transition from pandemic emergency to endemic management, changed risk-benefit calculations, and normal patterns seen with non-mandatory adult vaccinations, rather than widespread rejection of vaccination based on distrust and conspiracy theorists like yourself.

More bovine excrement for which we have come accustomed on this sub forum of the site. The transcript contains numerous medical inaccuracies and misrepresentations of how vaccines and the immune system work. The scientific consensus, supported by extensive research and real-world evidence, is that vaccines are both safe and effective. Vaccines do provide protection against infection (not just symptom reduction), undergo rigorous safety testing, and have dramatically reduced deaths from preventable diseases. The immune system mechanisms described in the transcript are oversimplified and often incorrect - for example, vaccines do stimulate both systemic and mucosal immunity, and the portrayal of how T-cells and B-cells function misrepresents established immunology. Claims linking vaccines to autism, autoimmune diseases, and cancer are not supported by the scientific evidence. Major medical organizations worldwide, including the CDC, WHO, and medical academies, continue to recommend vaccination based on robust safety and efficacy data. While all medical interventions carry some risk, the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks for the vast majority of people.

Obviously in your case it is, starting with high school and working up from there based on the points you made.

Rating lower than George, is that even possible? Seems so.

With so little information your thread as all the markings of a troll rather than someone who got scammed.

I would lean more to the fact that not a single post you make has an ounce of logic to it.

So much misinformed nonsense but whats new on this forum? The claim hinges on a conspiracy theory that dismisses scientific evidence by alleging systemic bias in research due to pharmaceutical funding. Here's what's gone wrong: Over-generalization: Not all scientific journals are funded by "Big Pharma." Many are supported by academic institutions, government grants, or independent organizations. Peer-reviewed journals like Nature or The Lancet have rigorous editorial processes to minimize bias. Misunderstanding Peer Review: The peer-review process involves independent experts scrutinizing studies for validity. While funding can influence research, it doesn’t automatically invalidate results. Studies on COVID vaccines undergo global scrutiny, with data from diverse sources like public health agencies and independent researchers. Ignoring Evidence: Claims that vaccines "kill people" often cherry-pick rare adverse events (e.g., myocarditis or blood clots) while ignoring extensive data showing vaccines’ safety and efficacy. For example, studies from the CDC, WHO, and independent researchers (e.g., in NEJM or BMJ) show serious side effects are rare (<0.01% for most vaccines). Echo Chamber Effect: The person likely consumed unverified information from sources that amplify distrust in institutions. Social media platforms like X can create echo chambers where misinformation spreads without challenge, reinforcing biases. Logical Fallacy: The argument assumes funding equals corruption, ignoring that science thrives on replication and transparency. If vaccines were dangerous, independent researchers, whistleblowers, or competing companies would expose it for credibility or profit. This is misinformation amplified by distrust and selective exposure to biased narratives.

My guess is its related to skin color, something bigots struggle with.

The article doesn't clarify if armaments will be attached to the drones for the 'hunt'.

The current Los Angeles protests, sparked by aggressive immigration raids ordered by the Trump administration, began escalating after federal agents clashed with demonstrators, leading to the deployment of National Guard troops and Marines. According to reports, Los Angeles was relatively peaceful before these raids, with local police noting that protests remained largely nonviolent until federal actions intensified tensions. Governor Gavin Newsom and local officials have criticized the deployment as an unlawful overreach, arguing it sows chaos rather than restores order. Compared to January 6, 2021, when Trump supporters stormed the Capitol to disrupt the certification of the 2020 election, the LA protests differ in cause and context. January 6 was a direct attack on democratic institutions, incited by false claims of election fraud and enabled by Trump’s inaction in deploying the National Guard. In contrast, the LA unrest stems from opposition to federal immigration policies, with protesters reacting to what they see as heavy-handed enforcement. While January 6 aimed to subvert a democratic process, the LA protests reflect civil dissent against executive actions, though both involve significant federal response and accusations of authoritarianism.

You're a scouser, what did you expect? I went there in the 70's and it was one of the biggest dumps in the UK. Nothings changed.

Old age and senility another reason. Some people living alone struggle with modern day processes to renew a passport or renew their extension of stay, even with plenty of money in the bank.

It's not uncommon for political groups or individuals to use demographic data to push particular agendas, often creating fear or division as this news item clearly strives for. Furthermore, demographic changes often occur in ways that defy simple predictions. Immigration patterns, birth rates, and other factors can all shift rapidly in response to changes in the economy, politics, and world events. As for whether the predictions will lead to fragmentation or not, it depends largely on how the UK chooses to respond to this potential shift. The focus on being “White British” in the article can indeed be seen as a form of bias, or even racism, especially when it’s portrayed as a zero-sum game where one group’s increase means another’s decline. The idea that one’s ethnic identity or heritage is more important or superior to another’s is a harmful and destructive narrative that can drive people apart rather than bringing them together.

The world’s two worst people are finally having a big, beautiful breakup.